From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Mar 21 17:10:19 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE2FB3DA
 for <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>; Thu, 21 Mar 2013 17:10:19 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from quartz@sneakertech.com)
Received: from relay02.pair.com (relay02.pair.com [209.68.5.16])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 82699D4F
 for <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>; Thu, 21 Mar 2013 17:10:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 84319 invoked by uid 0); 21 Mar 2013 17:10:18 -0000
Received: from 173.48.104.62 (HELO ?10.2.2.1?) (173.48.104.62)
 by relay02.pair.com with SMTP; 21 Mar 2013 17:10:18 -0000
X-pair-Authenticated: 173.48.104.62
Message-ID: <514B3EF9.2000105@sneakertech.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 13:10:17 -0400
From: Quartz <quartz@sneakertech.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6;
 rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jeremy Chadwick <jdc@koitsu.org>
Subject: Re: ZFS question
References: <20130321044557.GA15977@icarus.home.lan>
 <514AA192.2090006@sneakertech.com> <20130321085304.GB16997@icarus.home.lan>
In-Reply-To: <20130321085304.GB16997@icarus.home.lan>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Filesystems <freebsd-fs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-fs>,
 <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
 <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 17:10:19 -0000


> I've changed the CC line to use freebsd-fs@ instead, and will follow-up
> with freebsd-questions@ stating that the thread/discussion has been
> moved.

Ok, I'm not yet subscribed to -fs, so lemme do that. Once that's set up 
I'll continue there with a different (more descriptive) subject line.


>I also don't want to get into a discussion
> about -RELEASE vs. -STABLE because I could practically write a book on
> the subject (particularly why -STABLE is a better choice).

While I understand that -stable is probably better for typical use, I 
want to cut out as many variables as possible until I figure out what's 
going on here. But yes, this is a different argument for another time.


______________________________________
it has a certain smooth-brained appeal