From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jan 8 8:51:30 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mcqueen.wolfsburg.de (pns.wobline.de [212.68.68.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8982837B437 for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 08:51:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from colt.ncptiddische.net (ppp-220.wobline.de [212.68.69.231]) by mcqueen.wolfsburg.de (8.11.3/8.11.3/tw-20010821) with ESMTP id g08GoqM30060; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 17:50:52 +0100 Received: from tisys.org (poison.ncptiddische.net [192.168.0.5]) by colt.ncptiddische.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g08GpjX44001; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 17:51:46 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from nils@tisys.org) Received: (from nils@localhost) by tisys.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g08Gp6m01940; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 17:51:06 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from nils) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 17:51:06 +0100 From: "'Nils Holland'" To: Lawrence Farr Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 4.5-PRERELEASE: VIA chases again... Message-ID: <20020108175106.A1838@tisys.org> Mail-Followup-To: Lawrence Farr , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <20020108170045.A1248@tisys.org> <001b01c1985e$76bd26a0$c80fa8c0@lfarr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <001b01c1985e$76bd26a0$c80fa8c0@lfarr>; from freebsd-net@epcdirect.co.uk on Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 04:06:40PM -0000 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD poison.ncptiddische.net 4.5-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 4.5-PRERELEASE X-Machine-Uptime: 5:46PM up 2:31, 1 user, load averages: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 04:06:40PM -0000, Lawrence Farr stood up and spoke: > Have you got the UFS_DIRHASH code on? I'm trying without that currently. Yes, I currently have that on but may try without it later. RIght now, however, it seems as if softupdates has something to do with my crashes. My restore operation did indeed work without softupdates, while with softupdates it almost instantly crashed. I will do some more investigations on the softupdates vs. no softupdates issue and see what I can find out. The strange thing, however, is that my other machines don't seem to care if softupdates is on or not, they seem to work right either way. Greetings Nils -- Nils Holland Ti Systems - FreeBSD in Tiddische, Germany http://www.tisys.org * nils@tisys.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message