From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 26 13:56:30 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DC2B106566B for ; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 13:56:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glen.j.barber@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f225.google.com (mail-fx0-f225.google.com [209.85.220.225]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DAD38FC32 for ; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 13:56:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glen.j.barber@gmail.com) Received: by fxm25 with SMTP id 25so363967fxm.43 for ; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 06:56:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=p7BiaUhlwIpF9WGmnYidDl8y9JMo4FSwndNnfuRmlts=; b=iGDN0gaXwbfGsUyTvlv8PFTMmCcFaymSfGlLg/SL5b7HHQi0Nh+yvp3coNQ2Bn4yCU Qu4CEi/713NQyqqf+3NY6xyvf2Ul2Bd1sA2w5X3Tmm+78IfReibQ740GnMVA0L5Qy4HY 95j1vU+KcLP09ZvVhDZZj86kw8cX25E+Z/tH8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=SV8tPd07TGvq1yZ4jodEzI3u7fVMCMXtRQop1NiQ08ni1N3L4r2brbB8zPJkHUWOVu JA/yhBzj7eTORMbMfCy3X/fu57JGzY/S/J77aAVDHwcxfhPS4/OtZlfAYp2AVuA6ck0w SMRKWTDTsxtjSaZ1r4N6MgSBW5w1eHVwGQ/wg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.100.10 with SMTP id w10mr1955942bkn.211.1248616588157; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 06:56:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 09:56:28 -0400 Message-ID: <4ad871310907260656v478be52q62998f0f06026f6b@mail.gmail.com> From: Glen Barber To: barbara Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-current Subject: Re: FreeBSD-8 and portsnap X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 13:56:31 -0000 On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 9:50 AM, barbara wrote: >> On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 3:23 AM, barbara wrot= e: >> > Why portsnap doesn't provide INDEX-8? >> > >> > >> >> Hi, Barbara >> >> They appear on my machine: >> >> %ls /usr/ports/INDEX-* >> /usr/ports/INDEX-5 =A0 =A0 =A0/usr/ports/INDEX-7 =A0 =A0 =A0/usr/ports/I= NDEX-8.bz2 >> /usr/ports/INDEX-6 =A0 =A0 =A0/usr/ports/INDEX-8 > > If you remove them, you will see that INDEX-8 is missing. > Also check the dates of the files. > This will make portversion misbehave. > I believe that is true with anything in ${PORTSDIR} -- if you remove a ${CATEGORY}/${PORT}, it will not be replaced through portsnap. I am not sure if this is true for c(v)sup, as I don't use it for my ports tree, but I expect it would restore the missing directory/files/etc. --=20 Glen Barber