From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 1 05:47:07 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1360716A417 for ; Sat, 1 Dec 2007 05:47:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jcw@highperformance.net) Received: from mx1.highperformance.net (dsl081-163-122.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [64.81.163.122]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D679D13C45B for ; Sat, 1 Dec 2007 05:47:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jcw@highperformance.net) Received: from w16.stradamotorsports.com (w16.stradamotorsports.com [192.168.1.16]) by mx1.highperformance.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id lB15l4g0013309 for ; Fri, 30 Nov 2007 21:47:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jcw@highperformance.net) Message-ID: <4750F55B.9030604@highperformance.net> Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 21:47:07 -0800 From: "Jason C. Wells" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070922) MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <33640.194.74.82.3.1196149681.squirrel@galain.elvandar.org> <474BCC28.7090305@gmail.com> <20071127103340.GA57584@mud.stack.nl> <4750312A.7080307@highperformance.net> <20071130210414.GA23425@soaustin.net> <20071130214228.GM50167@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <20071130214228.GM50167@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=2.5 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=failed version=3.1.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.6 (2006-10-03) on s4.stradamotorsports.com Subject: Re: duration of the ports freeze X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2007 05:47:07 -0000 Peter Jeremy wrote: > On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 03:04:14PM -0600, Mark Linimon wrote: > >> On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 07:50:02AM -0800, Jason C. Wells wrote: >> >>> It wouldn't surprise me if portmanager is hoping that KDE 4.0 will go >>> prime time real soon. That's my big conspiracy theory. >>> >> package builds out the door. The Razor, and past experience, would >> suggest that sweeping changes would delay all that significantly. >> > As a corollary, KDE4 will not hit the ports tree until after 7.0 and 6.3 > are released. > We lucked out last time and got current updates of both gnome and kde. Let me fix my original post. "It would be a pleasant surprise if portmgr were able to take KDE 4.0 to prime time real soon." Later, Jason