From owner-freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org Wed Sep 30 11:14:24 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-pkg@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97247A0C86A for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 11:14:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from isoa@kapsi.fi) Received: from mail.kapsi.fi (mx1.kapsi.fi [IPv6:2001:1bc8:1004::1:25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5596110DD; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 11:14:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from isoa@kapsi.fi) Received: from 91-159-15-56.elisa-laajakaista.fi ([91.159.15.56] helo=[192.168.255.112]) by mail.kapsi.fi with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZhFL4-0002bh-75; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 14:14:22 +0300 Subject: Re: Suggestion to add build/revision number to "pkg stats" To: Baptiste Daroussin , mfv References: <20150916165829.46ba52f6@gecko4> <55FC6977.6010704@gmx.net> <20150922220600.GE16800@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <56027399.8040101@kapsi.fi> <20150923163731.70398452@gecko4> <20150923215025.GM16800@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> Cc: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org From: Arto Pekkanen X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Message-ID: <560BC407.5020407@kapsi.fi> Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 14:14:15 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20150923215025.GM16800@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="v204uewaE9jRVFmNDJWPi9BUWAgva7LaK" X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 91.159.15.56 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: isoa@kapsi.fi X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on mail.kapsi.fi); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-BeenThere: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Binary package management and package tools discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 11:14:24 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --v204uewaE9jRVFmNDJWPi9BUWAgva7LaK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 24.9.2015 0:50, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 04:37:31PM -0400, mfv wrote: >> >> I've tried to sync the ports tree and packages based on a date but hav= e >> not been able to identify one. However, between a date and a build >> number my guilt feeling is that the latter is the safer option. >=20 > Not if I take the date of the last commit of the revision we use except= that it > won't work with portsnap but maybe we can find a trick there too. Bapt, what you suggested would work perfectly. Actually this is a better solution than what I suggested at first. Start = of build date might be actually a bit off from the actual date of the lat= est revision used for the build. So, the date of latest revision of the ports tree that was used to build = a repository would be certainly the best option to include in pkg stats. But for now I will keep using the https://pkg-status.freebsd.org to deter= mine the start of build time, as suggested by Marek. I do realize now tha= t the start of build time might be a bit off from the actual date of late= st revision the build was based on, but still it is closer than what I've= managed to determine thus far. --v204uewaE9jRVFmNDJWPi9BUWAgva7LaK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (MingW32) iF4EAREIAAYFAlYLxAoACgkQTBivhqtJa269wAD8DOdHzH09ii/kpsssTFC9eAby PFLgn9G7nMvyVMC7lKEA/1WWL6T8gv8ll5nay4a/V1TlqTvDXhGqbD1uR2t0xRKj =wlqX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --v204uewaE9jRVFmNDJWPi9BUWAgva7LaK--