From owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 28 06:51:11 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 038F5106566B for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 06:51:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from sola.nimnet.asn.au (paqi.nimnet.asn.au [115.70.110.159]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A6D38FC14 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 06:51:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sola.nimnet.asn.au (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id p2S6p7ta072939; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 17:51:08 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 17:51:06 +1100 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: Luigi Rizzo In-Reply-To: <20110328064454.GA63583@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> Message-ID: <20110328173822.J33521@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: <201103280614.p2S6EKUC032325@freefall.freebsd.org> <20110328064454.GA63583@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/155927: [ipfw] ipfw stops to check bags for compliance with the rules, letting everything Rules X-BeenThere: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: IPFW Technical Discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 06:51:11 -0000 On Mon, 28 Mar 2011, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 06:14:20AM +0000, linimon@freebsd.org wrote: > > Old Synopsis: Ipfw stops to check bags for compliance with the rules, letting everything Rules > > New Synopsis: [ipfw] ipfw stops to check bags for compliance with the rules, letting everything Rules > > > > Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-standards->freebsd-ipfw > > Responsible-Changed-By: linimon > > Responsible-Changed-When: Mon Mar 28 06:13:10 UTC 2011 > > Responsible-Changed-Why: > > reclassify, although I do not think there is enough information here > > to proceed. > > interesting use of the term 'bag' for 'packet'! Even with that cleared up, I can't make out what it may have to do with syslogging .. perhaps one of our Russian speakers could intermediate? cheers, Ian