From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 28 10:34:37 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AE0537B404 for ; Mon, 28 Apr 2003 10:34:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sccrmhc02.attbi.com (sccrmhc02.attbi.com [204.127.202.62]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94F2843F93 for ; Mon, 28 Apr 2003 10:34:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from DougB@freebsd.org) Received: from master.dougb.net (12-234-22-23.client.attbi.com[12.234.22.23]) by sccrmhc02.attbi.com (sccrmhc02) with SMTP id <2003042817343500200o1pgse>; Mon, 28 Apr 2003 17:34:35 +0000 Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 10:34:34 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug Barton To: Alexey Dokuchaev In-Reply-To: <20030428100246.GB70290@regency.nsu.ru> Message-ID: <20030428103349.G3894@znfgre.qbhto.arg> References: <20030426154030.M13476@znfgre.qbhto.arg> <20030427105313.GA507@roughtrade.net> <20030428100246.GB70290@regency.nsu.ru> Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ X-message-flag: Outlook -- Not just for spreading viruses anymore! MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [FreeBSD-rc] Re: RFC: Removal of the old rc system from -current X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 17:34:37 -0000 On Mon, 28 Apr 2003, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > On Sun, Apr 27, 2003 at 08:53:13PM +1000, Joshua Goodall wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 26, 2003 at 03:46:08PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > > > We're also starting to see some confusion on the part of users about > > > having both systems on disk. > > > > Time to teach mergemaster about files that are now stale, so it can > > offer to remove (or archive) them for the user? > > It would be nice to teach make intallworld to remove stale files from > the base as well. There is an enormous amount of discussion about that point in the -current archives. Suffice it to say, it's not nearly as easy as it sounds. Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection