From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 26 15:55:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 9E0751065672; Sun, 26 Dec 2010 15:55:04 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2010 15:55:04 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Josh Paetzel Message-ID: <20101226155504.GA33119@FreeBSD.org> References: <201012261532.oBQFW2KG016140@repoman.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201012261532.oBQFW2KG016140@repoman.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/databases/skytools Makefile distinfo X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: **OBSOLETE** CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2010 15:55:04 -0000 On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 03:32:02PM +0000, Josh Paetzel wrote: > jpaetzel 2010-12-26 15:32:02 UTC > > Modified files: > databases/skytools Makefile distinfo > Log: > Update to 2.1.12 > > PR: ports/153442 > Submitted by: Khee Chin > Approved by: Khee Chin (maintainer) Explicit "Approved by" tag is redundant here: obviously, maintainer had approved its own submission. Unless, of course, you've altered the diff substantially enough to warrant another approval (of your changes, this time). ./danfe