From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Jul 10 19:36:15 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5754937B400; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 19:36:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B923843E42; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 19:36:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.12.5/8.12.5) id g6B2aA5N095978; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 21:36:10 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 21:36:10 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: Chad David Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, alfred@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: tuning for samba Message-ID: <20020711023610.GA98298@dan.emsphone.com> References: <20020710180711.A43342@colnta.acns.ab.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020710180711.A43342@colnta.acns.ab.ca> X-OS: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In the last episode (Jul 10), Chad David said: > As a side note, the data being served will be attached to the samba server > via NFS. Wouldn't it be better to run samba directly on the server that's providing the data? Why force it over the network twice? -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message