Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 10:48:01 -0500 From: "Haulmark, Chris" <chris@sigd.net> To: <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: RE: Porting an application that requires another port to be patched.. Message-ID: <6FC9F9894A9F8C49A722CF9F2132FC2202F79F95@ms05.mailstreet2003.net>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Someone broke the silence:=20 > Hello, >=20 > I finally got the time to try to port Maia MailGuard. >=20 > One of the requirement is to have amavisd-new patched. >=20 > Only two options I can see.. >=20 > 1. Communicate with the maintainer of amavisd-new to ask for > an additional arguement like "WITH-MAILGUARD" and patch file will be > in the files dir.=20 >=20 > 2. Set up the Maia MailGuard to do the patching instead. >=20 Allow me to add #3. Quoted from David Morton off the Maia MailGuard users mailing list: "The current state of things has a replacement for amavisd-new, called amavisd-maia. That means that the default amavisd-new can be left in place, but inactive, while amavisd-maia runs on a slightly modified amavisd.conf (but I assume an upgrade to amavisd-new package would not actually modify the amavisd.conf, would it?)." 3. Create a port named amavis-maia. > Any suggestions? >=20 > Chris > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6FC9F9894A9F8C49A722CF9F2132FC2202F79F95>