Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 18 Jan 2005 10:48:01 -0500
From:      "Haulmark, Chris" <chris@sigd.net>
To:        <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Subject:   RE: Porting an application that requires another port to be patched..
Message-ID:  <6FC9F9894A9F8C49A722CF9F2132FC2202F79F95@ms05.mailstreet2003.net>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Someone broke the silence:=20

> Hello,
>=20
> I finally got the time to try to port Maia MailGuard.
>=20
> One of the requirement is to have amavisd-new patched.
>=20
> Only two options I can see..
>=20
> 1.  Communicate with the maintainer of amavisd-new to ask for
> an additional arguement like "WITH-MAILGUARD" and patch file will be
> in the files dir.=20
>=20
> 2.  Set up the Maia MailGuard to do the patching instead.
>=20

Allow me to add #3.

Quoted from David Morton off the Maia MailGuard users mailing list:

"The current state of things has a replacement for amavisd-new, called
amavisd-maia.  That means that the default amavisd-new can be left in
place, but inactive, while amavisd-maia runs on a slightly modified
amavisd.conf (but I assume an upgrade to amavisd-new package would not
actually modify the amavisd.conf, would it?)."

3.  Create a port named amavis-maia.


> Any suggestions?
>=20
> Chris
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
> "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6FC9F9894A9F8C49A722CF9F2132FC2202F79F95>