From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jun 12 11:28:38 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from snoop.burghcom.com (burgcom.cust.stargate.net [209.166.166.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 67DCC37B403 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 11:28:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jl@burghcom.com) Received: (qmail 67991 invoked from network); 12 Jun 2001 18:28:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO 1185) (209.114.160.245) by snoop.burghcom.com with SMTP; 12 Jun 2001 18:28:27 -0000 Message-ID: <00c801c0f36d$77c5a400$f5a072d1@hq.sgi.net> From: "Jeff Love" To: References: <3B25CAEC.27AF9D30@cisco.com> <3B265CE9.516AFB04@cisco.com> Subject: Re: Why is the STABLE branch not so stable anymore? Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 14:28:25 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Yeah, CVSup's ability to maintain a local repository. With this > methodology, instead of using CVSup to keep /usr/{ports,src} up to date > one keeps their local repo up to date and then uses cvs to checkout > directly from there. If you've done a cvs upgrade to OpenBSD, that's how it works. Jeff Love Burgh-Com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message