From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 28 04:03:30 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0155316A4CE; Fri, 28 Nov 2003 04:03:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from debussy.private.org (25.60.138.210.bn.2iij.net [210.138.60.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B080543FEC; Fri, 28 Nov 2003 04:03:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by debussy.private.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hASC3exi001639; Fri, 28 Nov 2003 21:03:40 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp) Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2003 21:03:40 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20031128.210340.607957348.chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp> To: Pavel@Janik.cz From: Nakata Maho In-Reply-To: References: <20031127.223434.846935079.chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp> Organization: private X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on XEmacs 21.4.14 (Reasonable Discussion) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: ports@freebsd.org cc: jaroshenko@mailru.com cc: dev@porting.openoffice.org cc: openoffice@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [porting-dev] Towards OpenOffice.org ports for FreeBSD 5.2-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2003 12:03:30 -0000 Hi, Pavel, > From: Nakata Maho > Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 22:34:34 +0900 (JST) > > > `it works for me, and I'm 99% sure that this port will work for > > No one can tell that surely. Do you know exactly where the fundamental So, I told 99%. > problem with linking is? It can be hidden anywhere and you will risk users' > satisfaction. For FreeBSD, it is still hard to say OOo has productivity quality. I read your IZ, different specification of dlopen, might affect everywhere in OOo. For FreeBSD, we need more developers. absolutely. and also I want to draw FreeBSD hackers attentions. there are huge number of Linux hackers, but still the numbers of *BSD related person are extemely few... --maho