From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jun 20 04:46:21 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 938E51065673
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 20 Jun 2012 04:46:21 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [89.206.35.99])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0397A8FC19
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 20 Jun 2012 04:46:20 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5K4kK7o071054;
	Wed, 20 Jun 2012 06:46:20 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost)
	by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id
	q5K4kKfm071051; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 06:46:20 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 06:46:20 +0200 (CEST)
From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
To: Erich Dollansky <erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com>
In-Reply-To: <201206201140.31525.erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206200645290.71030@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
References: <402199FE-380B-41B6-866B-7D5D66C457D5@lpthe.jussieu.fr>
	<854D02B1-CA89-4F5E-8773-DB05F2868D74@lpthe.jussieu.fr>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.1206200618290.46371@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
	<201206201140.31525.erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7
	(wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [127.0.0.1]);
	Wed, 20 Jun 2012 06:46:20 +0200 (CEST)
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Michel Talon <talon@lpthe.jussieu.fr>
Subject: Re: CLANG vs GCC tests of fortran/f2c program
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 04:46:21 -0000

>
>> How about leaving politics and getting back to technical grounds?
>
> what is the problem as long as gcc is in the ports tree?

what is a problem as clang is in the ports tree?

the problem is that these compilers are not 100% compatible and soon if 
clang will be default it will be not just easy to build freebsd with gcc.