From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 19:25:48 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AF2316A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 19:25:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from odot.okladot.state.ok.us (odot.okladot.state.ok.us [192.149.244.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A9A643D2D for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 19:25:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from root@techpc04.okladot.state.ok.us) Received: from techpc04.okladot.state.ok.us (techpc04.okladot.state.ok.us [199.27.9.37])OAA64624; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 14:25:27 -0500 Received: by techpc04.okladot.state.ok.us (Postfix, from userid 0) id 1C2755C29; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 14:25:27 -0500 (CDT) To: "Carl Makin" From: "Paul Seniura" Errors-To: "Paul Seniura" Sender: "Paul Seniura" In-Reply-To: <1088385053.18392.3.camel@newton.aipo.gov.au> References: <1088385053.18392.3.camel@newton.aipo.gov.au> Message-Id: <20040628192527.1C2755C29@techpc04.okladot.state.ok.us> Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 14:25:27 -0500 (CDT) cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Q's about IBM TSM (was Re: HEADSUP: ibcs2 and svr4 compat headed for history) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Paul Seniura List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 19:25:48 -0000 Hello, Excuse my butting-in, but TSM is quite important for us, too. > It will cause us a lot of grief unless we can find an alternative way to > run IBM's Tivoli Storage Manager. We currently use the SCO v2 client > which has huge warts, but runs. Could you take time or point me to something that would explain how to use the SCO client, please? We'd be another bunch to add to the ibcs/svr group if it actually works here, too. ;) > The linux client trips over the whole filesystem overlay thing badly and > I'm not sure disabling that to run just the TSM client is a good idea. > (Plus I hate the idea of maintaining custom kernel patches.) I've had no luck, likewise, with the Linux TSM client. I had never considered another compatible client until seeing your msg just now. FWIW, our support contract with IBM does cover TSM clients, but IBM won't consider a FreeBSD-native client despite their supporting their MacOSX client very well & officially. IBM says they need more "user base" to even consider a BSD flavor... go figure... I'm tracking -Current via CTM etc. > Carl. TIA -- Paul Seniura System Specialist State of Okla. D.O.T.