From owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 7 19:38:52 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C96651065686 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2008 19:38:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sam@errno.com) Received: from ebb.errno.com (ebb.errno.com [69.12.149.25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FEA58FC13 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2008 19:38:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sam@errno.com) Received: from trouble.errno.com (trouble.errno.com [10.0.0.248]) (authenticated bits=0) by ebb.errno.com (8.13.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id m27JcpT6001576 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 7 Mar 2008 11:38:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sam@errno.com) Message-ID: <47D199CB.3090707@errno.com> Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2008 11:38:51 -0800 From: Sam Leffler User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071125) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Yuri Lukin References: <85d001330803060619u53893319lc549e876e9cb73b9@mail.gmail.com> <1204820963.2126.243.camel@localhost> <47D02391.1030206@errno.com> <20080307184001.M17864@swaggi.com> In-Reply-To: <20080307184001.M17864@swaggi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-DCC-URT-Metrics: ebb.errno.com; whitelist Cc: Tom Evans , "M. Vale" , freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HI, I have a laptop with the Atheros AR5006EG X-BeenThere: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Mobile computing with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2008 19:38:52 -0000 Yuri Lukin wrote: > On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 09:02:09 -0800, Sam Leffler wrote > >> But there are still other parts that not supported by this hal and I >> have no idea if and/or when they ever will be. Sorry, but Atheros >> stopped caring about open source users after certain folks left the company. >> >> Sam >> >> > > That's too bad because historically ath was the best bet for wireless in > freebsd (imho). Do you think this will delay future work such as multi-bss or > 802.11n in any way? > No.