From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Mar 12 10:26: 4 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB98C37B401 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 10:26:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-63-207-60-52.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [63.207.60.52]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC36E43FA3 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 10:26:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from rot13.obsecurity.org (rot13.obsecurity.org [10.0.0.5]) by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 882D266D6A; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 10:26:01 -0800 (PST) Received: by rot13.obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 60EB29F5; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 10:26:01 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 10:26:01 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: parv Cc: Kris Kennaway , "James E. Flemer" , freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: make index cruft (work/.comment_foo) Message-ID: <20030312182601.GC86403@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <20030312072029.GA84349@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030312092449.GA2211@moo.holy.cow> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="gatW/ieO32f1wygP" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030312092449.GA2211@moo.holy.cow> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org --gatW/ieO32f1wygP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 04:24:49AM -0500, parv wrote: > in message <20030312072029.GA84349@rot13.obsecurity.org>, wrote Kris > Kennaway thusly... > > > > On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 01:09:52AM -0500, James E. Flemer wrote: > > > Has anyone noticed that 'make index' seems to leave a lot of > > > cruft around. I believe every single port ends up with > > > a work/.comment_foo file. > >=20 > > Yes, it's due to the current method of dealing with the COMMENT > > variable (there are quoting bugs in bsd.port.mk, so it writes it > > out to a temporary file instead). This is an interim solution > > until someone fixes bsd.port.mk. >=20 > Thanks Kris. I was mystified too. In the meantime though, there is > not only no saving of inodes, but also a bit larger Makefiles due to > duplicity ... not that i am complaining (much). What duplicity are you referring to? Kris --gatW/ieO32f1wygP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+b3u4Wry0BWjoQKURAj/oAJ9JouKj0Qs4It/F6olgNfpNiPJcVwCgzrWC cTGc08/h1EwNKE22pNM8YbM= =4NNZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --gatW/ieO32f1wygP-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message