From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 5 19:04:11 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FC3337B401 for ; Mon, 5 May 2003 19:04:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4699043F75 for ; Mon, 5 May 2003 19:04:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from blueeskimo@gmx.net) Received: (qmail 801 invoked by uid 65534); 6 May 2003 02:04:08 -0000 Received: from i216-58-29-174.gta.igs.net (EHLO [216.58.29.174]) (216.58.29.174) by mail.gmx.net (mp023-rz3) with SMTP; 06 May 2003 04:04:08 +0200 From: Adam To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <3EB6F33E.3040108@users.sourceforge.net> References: <3EB6F33E.3040108@users.sourceforge.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-7OEn/+6GIxZjN8BhwevP" Organization: Message-Id: <1052186646.59237.173.camel@jake> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.4 Date: 05 May 2003 22:04:06 -0400 Subject: Re: portupgrade: installed package "succeeds port" ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 May 2003 02:04:11 -0000 --=-7OEn/+6GIxZjN8BhwevP Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2003-05-05 at 19:26, Rob Lahaye wrote: > Hello, >=20 > I have started using portupgrade package recently and it is indeed > a wonderful package compared to so basic ports handling by standard > FreeBSD software, that I wonder why portupgrade is not by default part > of the basic FreeBSD OS. Well, if you install portupgrade from the ports (using 'make install clean'), it is added to the package database. This way, you can later upgrade your portupgrade using 'portupgrade portupgrade', just like any other package. You'll notice that portupgrade is updated every month or so. > Anyway, when I install from ports with portupgrade, I get packages > listed as follows: >=20 > mplayer-gtk-0.90.0.110_1 > succeeds port (port has 0.90.0.110) > portupgrade-20030427 > succeeds port (port has 20030308_2) > ruby-1.6.8.2003.04.19 > succeeds port (port has 1.6.8.2003.01.19) > ruby-bdb1-0.1.9 > succeeds port (port has 0.1.8) > ruby-shim-ruby18-1.8.0.p2.2003.04.19 > succeeds port (port has 1.8.0.p2= ) > I'm sure I am in sync with the port, neverless it says that my installed > packages succeeds the port. Is that a bug in portupgrade package? Perhaps you have multiple installations of these 4 packages. If that was that case, at least one of them IS probably the latest, but there are lingering old versions that pkg_version thinks is outdated. You should run "pkgdb -F" as root to fix and problems of this nature. --=20 Adam --=-7OEn/+6GIxZjN8BhwevP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQA+txgWu3o4GBMSDL4RAi8XAJ416KaLGnqoDPblXBrfRe15MaPWKwCgp8hU mThorl60yF8nftwPUdSU9N4= =8y0G -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-7OEn/+6GIxZjN8BhwevP--