From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon May 12 09:14:53 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 90A0537B401; Mon, 12 May 2003 09:14:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from brian.webcom.it (brianlap.inet.it [213.92.1.190])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id E06A443F75; Mon, 12 May 2003 09:14:51 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from andrea@webcom.it)
Received: by brian.webcom.it (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 4ADBD2A; Mon, 12 May 2003 18:14:50 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 18:14:50 +0200
From: Andrea Campi <andrea@webcom.it>
To: Daniel Lang <langd-freebsd-hackers@leo.org>
Message-ID: <20030512161450.GB623@webcom.it>
References: <20030512124304.GC21837@atrbg11.informatik.tu-muenchen.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20030512124304.GC21837@atrbg11.informatik.tu-muenchen.de>
X-Echelon: BND CIA NSA Mossad KGB MI6 IRA detonator nuclear assault strike
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org
cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Chance for FreeBSD ADSM/TSM client from Tivoli/IBM
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
	<freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 16:14:53 -0000

On Mon, May 12, 2003 at 02:43:05PM +0200, Daniel Lang wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> in the past there have been discussions and demand
> for a *BSD client for TSM. To my best knowledge there is no 
> such client. In practice Linux and SCO clients have
> been abused partially using dirty tricks (like NFS loop
> mounts) to get it running.

[Requested info sent via private email]

FYI and for extra coolness bonus: ITSM server 5.1.6.3 for Linux runs just
great on a recent -CURRENT box. Not that I plan on running a production
server in emulation anytime soon, but it's good to know it would be possible
to do so.

Bye,
	Andrea

-- 
   "One world, one web, one program"  -- Microsoft promotional ad
         "Ein Volk, ein Reich, ein Fuehrer"  -- Adolf Hitler