Date: Tue, 22 Apr 1997 21:35:40 -0400 (EDT) From: Bradley Dunn <bradley@dunn.org> To: Michael Smith <msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au> Cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Need a common passwd file among machines Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.970422211907.11141C-100000@ns2.harborcom.net> In-Reply-To: <199704210703.QAA08288@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 21 Apr 1997, Michael Smith wrote: > "So what" is that the new Livingston code is Radius-2 compliant, and has > lots of nice features. What is "Radius-2 compliant"? AFAIK the only compliance that matters is RFC2138. The code at ftp://ftp.merit.edu/radius/releases/radius.23c.basic.tar.gz is free and is nearly compliant. (Actually the Livingston code is not compliant with the RFC either because they used port 1645 when it was already assigned.) The new features of the Livingston code are basically superficial junk like user menus and prefix/suffix support. pbd -- Why can't you be a non-conformist like everyone else?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.970422211907.11141C-100000>