From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Nov 23 15:34:46 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: stable@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BDA6BF3
 for <stable@FreeBSD.org>; Fri, 23 Nov 2012 15:34:46 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2DD88FC08
 for <stable@FreeBSD.org>; Fri, 23 Nov 2012 15:34:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from odyssey.starpoint.kiev.ua (alpha-e.starpoint.kiev.ua
 [212.40.38.101])
 by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id RAA05447;
 Fri, 23 Nov 2012 17:34:43 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org)
Message-ID: <50AF9793.3010602@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2012 17:34:43 +0200
From: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
 rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Patrick Lamaiziere <patfbsd@davenulle.org>
Subject: Re: Some new hardware with 9.1 does not reboot easily
References: <50ACA518.4050309@digiware.nl> <50ACEEFF.8010001@FreeBSD.org>
 <50AD0A20.2070408@digiware.nl> <50AD0AC2.5070804@FreeBSD.org>
 <50AD0B29.6060602@FreeBSD.org> <50AD0F00.5020600@digiware.nl>
 <50AD13EE.8050901@digiware.nl> <50AD17E4.50104@FreeBSD.org>
 <50AD189D.4040902@digiware.nl> <50AD1941.2020108@FreeBSD.org>
 <50ADF362.2040803@FreeBSD.org> <20121123140932.3a6deff6@mr129166>
 <50AF88AA.1060003@FreeBSD.org> <20121123162531.66bedee3@mr129166>
In-Reply-To: <20121123162531.66bedee3@mr129166>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "stable@freebsd.org" <stable@FreeBSD.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2012 15:34:46 -0000

on 23/11/2012 17:25 Patrick Lamaiziere said the following:
> I've applied your previous patch (#3, I think) to 9.1 with
> few modifications but a quick test doing a "poudriere bulk" (lot of
> ZFS mount/rollback) shows that the system quickly becomes instable. I
> didn't find the time to dig into this.

Please note that the patches are produced against head, so their applicability to
stable is a moving thing.  Sometimes they can apply just fine, but would be
incorrect, because of some changes that are committed to head, but not MFC-ed yet.

In either case, if you run into problems please report them.
Because, you know, when I commit and MFC the changes you might be affected to a
greater degree than during this testing phase.

"Unstable system" is way way too vague to describe a problem.

-- 
Andriy Gapon