From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Tue May 24 04:36:37 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DB20B477E1 for ; Tue, 24 May 2016 04:36:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: from www.zefox.net (www.zefox.net [69.239.235.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "www.zefox.org", Issuer "www.zefox.org" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 689B112B3; Tue, 24 May 2016 04:36:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: from www.zefox.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.zefox.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id u4O4aasi056443 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 23 May 2016 21:36:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: (from fbsd@localhost) by www.zefox.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id u4O4aaZu056442; Mon, 23 May 2016 21:36:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fbsd) Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 21:36:35 -0700 From: bob prohaska To: Ian Lepore Cc: "freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org" Subject: Re: Confirmed update procedure for a self-hosted armv6hf system Message-ID: <20160524043635.GD52783@www.zefox.net> References: <1463976239.1180.406.camel@freebsd.org> <20160523215248.GA52783@www.zefox.net> <1464055880.1180.433.camel@freebsd.org> <20160524024027.GB52783@www.zefox.net> <1464058197.1180.439.camel@freebsd.org> <20160524031855.GC52783@www.zefox.net> <1464060955.1180.441.camel@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1464060955.1180.441.camel@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 04:36:37 -0000 On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 09:35:55PM -0600, Ian Lepore wrote: > > Hmm, apparently my guess at the problem was wrong (although I think it > is true that the standard freebsd update sequence of booting to the new > kernel before installing world will fail here). > > I'm out of ideas right now. > I'll wait...mine are likely to be worse.... An aside though: the hf upgrade seems unable to materially affect compilation and installation. Is this mostly a naming mismatch between old and new version? bob prohaska