From owner-freebsd-ports  Sun May 14 06:12:12 1995
Return-Path: ports-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id GAA10853
          for ports-outgoing; Sun, 14 May 1995 06:12:12 -0700
Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id GAA10846
          ; Sun, 14 May 1995 06:12:10 -0700
Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.11/8.6.9) id GAA14099; Sun, 14 May 1995 06:11:37 -0700
Date: Sun, 14 May 1995 06:11:37 -0700
Message-Id: <199505141311.GAA14099@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
To: adam@veda.is
CC: adam@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org
In-reply-to: <199505141307.NAA08539@veda.is> (message from Adam David on Sun, 14 May 1995 13:07:06 +0000 (GMT))
Subject: Re: dgd port package failed again
From: asami@CS.Berkeley.EDU (Satoshi Asami | =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQHUbKEI=?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOCsbKEIgGyRCOC0bKEI=?=)
Sender: ports-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

 * Package creation now works again. Fixed for now by using a temporary PLIST.

Well, I'm sure you've gotten my other mail by now, but it's not
working!

Please stop trying to outsmart bsd.port.mk and pkg_*.  You may get it
to work by using "undocumented features" again, but they are changing
quite rapidly as we haven't really finalized what our framework is
going to be, and until that happens, having an "odd" port like this is 
just a pain in the neck.

Satoshi