From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 5 18:25:38 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2ED11065672 for ; Tue, 5 May 2009 18:25:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net) Received: from mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0A2E8FC24 for ; Tue, 5 May 2009 18:25:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net) Received: from sarevok.dnr.servegame.org (mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net [192.168.2.11]) by mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AC617E837; Tue, 5 May 2009 10:25:37 -0800 (AKDT) From: Mel Flynn To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 20:25:36 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.11.2 (FreeBSD/8.0-CURRENT; KDE/4.2.2; i386; ; ) References: <49FC10DE.9000401@isafeelin.org> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200905052025.36255.mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> Cc: Frederique Rijsdijk , nf Subject: Re: Poor ZFS performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 May 2009 18:25:39 -0000 On Monday 04 May 2009 02:07:41 nf wrote: > On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 7:22 PM, Frederique Rijsdijk > > wrote: > > nf wrote: > >> 733843456 bytes transferred in 61.124812 secs (12005656 bytes/sec) > > > > That is very low. I get about 60MB/sec in this way. Adding bs=1m it'll go > > up to 240MB/sec even (raidz1 with 4*1TB). > > > > Could you show top -S ? > > I will, the next time I experience the issue. > > I had already rebooted the box, which immediately alleviated the > issue. I can only presume, at this point, that it seems to have been > related to the 2gb of allocated/active memory shown by top. I had no > memory intensive apps running, merely an idle lighttpd, mysqld, and > rtorrent (which only occupied about 90mb). There's a thread or 2 on -current list about ZFS arc cache growth, that you may or may not be seeing as well. -- Mel