From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Apr  2 19:57:58 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1BA737B401
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Wed,  2 Apr 2003 19:57:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from starbug.ugh.net.au (starbug.ugh.net.au [203.31.238.37])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71E7E43F85
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Wed,  2 Apr 2003 19:57:55 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from andrew@ugh.net.au)
Received: by starbug.ugh.net.au (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 0083EA804; Thu,  3 Apr 2003 13:57:53 +1000 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by starbug.ugh.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id B965A5453; Thu,  3 Apr 2003 13:57:53 +1000 (EST)
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2003 13:57:53 +1000 (EST)
From: Andrew <andrew@ugh.net.au>
To: Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-stable-local@be-well.no-ip.com>
In-Reply-To: <44istwl35o.fsf@be-well.ilk.org>
Message-ID: <20030403135720.R39017-100000@starbug.ugh.net.au>
X-WonK: *wibble*
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: More 4.8 make release woes
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2003 03:57:59 -0000



On 2 Apr 2003, Lowell Gilbert wrote:

> Andrew <andrew@ugh.net.au> writes:
>
> > Any ideas? Obviously it must have fitted for someone else...
>
> Not true.
>
> They're working on it.

Ahh OK...I thought it was required for building the ISOs...I feel better
its not just me :-)

Thanks,

Andrew