From owner-svn-src-user@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 19 07:21:19 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-user@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5F4A106564A; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 07:21:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian@FreeBSD.org) Received: from svn.freebsd.org (svn.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::2c]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95B108FC14; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 07:21:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from svn.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by svn.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p7J7LJ7D092415; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 07:21:19 GMT (envelope-from adrian@svn.freebsd.org) Received: (from adrian@localhost) by svn.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p7J7LJhU092413; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 07:21:19 GMT (envelope-from adrian@svn.freebsd.org) Message-Id: <201108190721.p7J7LJhU092413@svn.freebsd.org> From: Adrian Chadd Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 07:21:19 +0000 (UTC) To: src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-user@freebsd.org X-SVN-Group: user MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Subject: svn commit: r224998 - user/adrian/if_ath_tx/sys/dev/ath X-BeenThere: svn-src-user@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the experimental " user" src tree" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 07:21:19 -0000 Author: adrian Date: Fri Aug 19 07:21:19 2011 New Revision: 224998 URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/224998 Log: Note some more things to look at. Modified: user/adrian/if_ath_tx/sys/dev/ath/README Modified: user/adrian/if_ath_tx/sys/dev/ath/README ============================================================================== --- user/adrian/if_ath_tx/sys/dev/ath/README Fri Aug 19 07:12:50 2011 (r224997) +++ user/adrian/if_ath_tx/sys/dev/ath/README Fri Aug 19 07:21:19 2011 (r224998) @@ -34,6 +34,17 @@ Things that need doing! one was used? - what else would be helpful? +* Am I too aggressively scheduling things, and thus the aggregation code + doesn't ever get a chance to form decent sized aggregates? + +* I'm getting a lot of OOR packets at the receive end, is this because + of a large number of software retries? or is it that, combined with + TX'ing a long list of aggregates that mostly fill the BAW, meaning + packets can stay out of order for longer (but still be within the BAW?) + I bet this'd piss off TCP, if it had to wait for 20/30 packets + before it received the next retransmit (and thus the AMPDU RX queue + would get flushed.) + Things that need investigating! There's a crash which occurs when a wlan interface is destroyed and