From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Dec 1 01:47:00 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id BAA24786 for ports-outgoing; Mon, 1 Dec 1997 01:47:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports) Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (root@mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id BAA24781 for ; Mon, 1 Dec 1997 01:46:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wosch@cs.tu-berlin.de) Received: from panke.panke.de (anonymous213.ppp.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.213]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.8.6/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA08916; Mon, 1 Dec 1997 10:28:49 +0100 (MET) Received: (from wosch@localhost) by panke.panke.de (8.8.5/8.6.12) id LAA01485; Sun, 30 Nov 1997 11:43:16 +0100 (MET) To: "Justin M. Seger" Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: lynx References: <199711290430.XAA12193@freebsd.scds.com> From: Wolfram Schneider Date: 30 Nov 1997 11:43:13 +0100 In-Reply-To: "Justin M. Seger"'s message of Fri, 28 Nov 1997 23:30:39 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: Lines: 12 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk "Justin M. Seger" writes: > Should we perhaps have a lynx and a lynx-current port? Yes! > It seems that whenever I go to build lynx these days, the distfile > isn't available on any sites because it's out of date. > Any opinions? -- Wolfram Schneider http://www.apfel.de/~wosch/