Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 10:53:11 -0700 (MST) From: Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org> To: phk@phk.freebsd.dk Cc: rwatson@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] IPX and NWFS to be killed in -current. Message-ID: <20041207.105311.74679218.imp@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: <98421.1102400993@critter.freebsd.dk> References: <20041206230309.GN92212@wantadilla.lemis.com> <98421.1102400993@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >Why don't you leave that kind of decision to the people who run the > >project? Your intentions appear to be at variance with those of the > >two members of core who have responded. > > That is a refreshingly easy question to answer: because core has time > and again said that they prefer to act on specific requests. Core has been transitioning to a more proactive role in making these sorts of decisions over the past 9 months or so. This can be seen both in terms of what we're doing as individuals, as well as the things we're talking about in our conference calls. Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041207.105311.74679218.imp>