From owner-freebsd-isp Fri Nov 15 09:03:20 1996 Return-Path: owner-isp Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id JAA29779 for isp-outgoing; Fri, 15 Nov 1996 09:03:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from brasil.moneng.mei.com (brasil.moneng.mei.com [151.186.109.160]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id JAA29763 for ; Fri, 15 Nov 1996 09:03:10 -0800 (PST) Received: (from jgreco@localhost) by brasil.moneng.mei.com (8.7.Beta.1/8.7.Beta.1) id LAA28156; Fri, 15 Nov 1996 11:01:50 -0600 From: Joe Greco Message-Id: <199611151701.LAA28156@brasil.moneng.mei.com> Subject: Re: Decision in Router Purchase To: root@buffnet.net (Steve Hovey) Date: Fri, 15 Nov 1996 11:01:49 -0600 (CST) Cc: jgreco@brasil.moneng.mei.com, shovey@buffnet.net, bradley@dunn.org, isp@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: from "Steve Hovey" at Nov 15, 96 11:59:06 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-isp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > Excellent. You have scientifically determined the problem. Clearly > > FreeBSD is at fault. > > > > It COULDN'T be ANYTHING else. > > > > (For those of us who live in the real world, this is known as "faulty > > reasoning".) > > > > But hey, like, my old car doesn't work (anymore). My new car does. Clearly > > Pontiac is faulty and Ford is not. > > > > What a way to start a Friday morning. :-) > > i get the direct impression you wrote some or all of the tcp/ip code > after 2.0 or something. You are taking this way too personally. No, I am making lots of fun of your logical processes. Not only am I not taking it personally, I don't really care too much because I've clearly gotten the direct impression that you are not interested in solving the problem. Still, it would be nice to know what's wrong. Because there are those of us doing this on a large scale who (by your account) should be seeing this problem on an equally large scale. And I, at least, am not seeing this. ... JG