Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 22 Jul 2019 11:57:15 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 239144] Identify generic RC framework extensions to improve ports script debugging
Message-ID:  <bug-239144-7788-iXPQJkjxXt@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-239144-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-239144-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D239144

--- Comment #4 from Kyle Evans <kevans@freebsd.org> ---
(In reply to Pietro Cerutti from comment #3)

The idea is to pitch it first and see if others find it acceptable. This wi=
ll
be the form that this stuff should get committed in later if the name/idea =
are
found acceptable since it sets up the default the framework will be providi=
ng
and it's easily greppable to remove once the framework provides the default=
 in
all supported versions.

It's not ideal, but this is likely the easiest way to later identify what n=
eeds
fixed while allowing the framework to take over smoothly as changes propaga=
te
through.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-239144-7788-iXPQJkjxXt>