From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Dec 9 07:09:03 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id HAA08295 for questions-outgoing; Tue, 9 Dec 1997 07:09:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions) Received: from mailb.telia.com (mailb.telia.com [194.22.194.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id HAA08285 for ; Tue, 9 Dec 1997 07:08:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from girgen@partitur.se) Received: from d1o62.telia.com (root@d1o62.telia.com [195.198.198.241]) by mailb.telia.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA23450; Tue, 9 Dec 1997 16:07:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from partitur.se (t6o62p11.telia.com [195.198.199.71]) by d1o62.telia.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA29676; Tue, 9 Dec 1997 16:07:57 +0100 (MET) Message-ID: <348D5F25.BEF68070@partitur.se> Date: Tue, 09 Dec 1997 16:09:25 +0100 From: Palle Girgensohn Organization: Partitur X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2.5-STABLE i386) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, samba@samba.anu.edu.au Subject: samba-des has bad performance Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------4AA5D0A4F78F71B6E1EE1063" Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------4AA5D0A4F78F71B6E1EE1063 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello! I have a problem with samba. I run the freebsd samba-des port (samba-des-1.9.17.4) in a pretty much vanilla setting; home dir, a few shared dirs, no printing (yet). The problem is performance. While Samba is not terribly slow it's still too slow. Copying large files takes about half a minute/meg on an Ethernet LAN with no other activity. Trying to read a file using netscape (file://server/blabla) gets me down to 40 KB/s, or less! One user has put his WinNetscape mail directory on the server, and claims that Netscape hardly starts after this. The machine is fast (PPro 200MHz, three SCSI-UW (w/ 2940-UW controller) disks, 128 MB RAM) running FreeBSD-stable (2.2.5) and it serves nfs, http and appletalk (using netatalk) much faster than samba, so it's probably not related to network hardware. In the same network, there is a P90 w/ IDE disks running NT Server 4 SP3. It outperforms Samba, and this annoys me ;-) Any ideas? Best regards, Palle Girgensohn PS. I enclose my smb.conf, just in case. DS. --------------4AA5D0A4F78F71B6E1EE1063 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; name="trumpet-smb.txt" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="trumpet-smb.txt" [global] comment = FreeBSD - Samba %v workgroup = Musik printing = bsd printcap name = /etc/printcap load printers = yes guest account = nobody ; This next option sets a separate log file for each client. Remove ; it if you want a combined log file. log file = /var/log/sambalog.%m dont descend = /dev,/proc,/root,/stand hosts allow = ipnumbers... lock directory = /usr/local/samba/var/locks share modes = yes map archive = no status = yes public = yes read only = no preserve case = yes strip dot = yes security = user encrypt passwords = yes guest ok = no dead time = 10 [homes] comment = Home Directories browseable = no read only = no create mode = 0770 [printers] comment = All Printers path = /var/spool/samba browseable = no printable = yes public = no writable = no create mode = 0700 [arkiv] comment = Arkivet public = yes writable = yes path = /disk2/data printable = no force group = user directory mask = 0770 create mode = 0660 delete readonly = yes --------------4AA5D0A4F78F71B6E1EE1063--