From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 31 04:13:32 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85645106564A; Thu, 31 May 2012 04:13:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from areilly@bigpond.net.au) Received: from nschwmtas02p.mx.bigpond.com (nschwmtas02p.mx.bigpond.com [61.9.189.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB8438FC0C; Thu, 31 May 2012 04:13:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nschwotgx04p.mx.bigpond.com ([124.188.162.192]) by nschwmtas02p.mx.bigpond.com with ESMTP id <20120531041324.SBHI22122.nschwmtas02p.mx.bigpond.com@nschwotgx04p.mx.bigpond.com>; Thu, 31 May 2012 04:13:24 +0000 Received: from johnny.reilly.home ([124.188.162.192]) by nschwotgx04p.mx.bigpond.com with ESMTP id <20120531041323.ENVY1687.nschwotgx04p.mx.bigpond.com@johnny.reilly.home>; Thu, 31 May 2012 04:13:23 +0000 Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 14:13:13 +1000 From: Andrew Reilly To: David Chisnall Message-ID: <20120531041313.GA97136@johnny.reilly.home> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-SIH-MSG-ID: qh47GNzuXAD+xDJw0jPvNAJ+xA/u8yI74J0WRdJsoQQZSkTduMjcU677NrM8kMf21z9cNh6PP2IqYaj0X4/QsOM= Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Why Are You Using FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 04:13:32 -0000 On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 07:20:31PM +0100, David Chisnall wrote: > If you had to list > the three things you most like about FreeBSD, which would you > pick? Are they the same as when you first started using it? 1) Using it doesn't require changing me (well, at least change is gradual and continuous.) (BSD since '86, even though the hardware dies every few years.) 2) Incremental updates from source are easy. (What's running corresponds to the source on the system, so I can fix breakage as I find it. Not that that's common.) 3) ZFS turns out to be very cool, and seems to work really well. (3) is new, but (1) and (2) have been there since the beginning (since it was the patchkit.) [Another change, not listed among the three most-liked things, but still something that I like equivocally, is that I've stopped fighting GUIs, and relegated my FreeBSD boxes to servers. GUI work I've delegated to Macs. That could yet change back/again, if Macs keep getting worse...] Cheers, -- Andrew