From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 24 12:52:14 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE05C16A4CE; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 12:52:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp3.server.rpi.edu (smtp3.server.rpi.edu [128.113.2.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0BAB43D3F; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 12:52:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from drosih@rpi.edu) Received: from [128.113.24.47] (gilead.netel.rpi.edu [128.113.24.47]) by smtp3.server.rpi.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i2OKqALP028090; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 15:52:10 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: drosih@mail.rpi.edu Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <4061EC4D.9020504@freebsd.org> References: <200403232227.i2NMRQn5042762@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040324164155.GA4737@dragon.nuxi.com> <4061EC4D.9020504@freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 15:52:09 -0500 To: Scott Long From: Garance A Drosihn Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" ; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . canit . ca) cc: Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= cc: src-committers@freebsd.org cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org cc: obrien@freebsd.org cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: removing src/usr.bin/doscmd ... X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 20:52:15 -0000 At 1:15 PM -0700 3/24/04, Scott Long wrote: >Garance A Drosihn wrote: >>At 8:38 PM +0100 3/24/04, Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav wrote: >> >>>"David O'Brien" writes: >>> > On Tue, Mar 23, 2004, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: >>> > > Log: >>> > > Remove doscmd from the base system now that it lives in >>> > > the ports tree. >>> > >>> > Did you *really* have consensus for this? >>> >>>Yes. >> >>That was not my impression. I had thought that it was going to >>stay until 6.0. (not that I care much either way, I'm just saying >>that it *was* my impression that a fair number of people wanted it >>to stay in the base system for now). > >To be fair, there are other packages in /usr/port/emulators that >are significantly better than doscmd. However, I'm open to >putting doscmd into the disc1 package set for releases if that >would help people feel better. I think it would be reasonable and helpful to do that. -- Garance Alistair Drosehn =3D gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu