From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 15 15:27:18 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A4700457 for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 15:27:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (bigwig.baldwin.cx [IPv6:2001:470:1f11:75::1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C166184 for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 15:27:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ralph.baldwin.cx (pool-173-70-85-31.nwrknj.fios.verizon.net [173.70.85.31]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3A0FAB941; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 11:27:17 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin To: Marcin Cieslak Subject: Re: panic: resource_list_alloc: resource entry is busy Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 11:22:35 -0400 Message-ID: <7492500.WNyRbPK6xq@ralph.baldwin.cx> User-Agent: KMail/4.10.5 (FreeBSD/10.0-STABLE; KDE/4.10.5; amd64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <3819796.R7BYA2qqa8@ralph.baldwin.cx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Mon, 15 Sep 2014 11:27:17 -0400 (EDT) Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 15:27:18 -0000 On Friday, September 12, 2014 10:03:26 PM Marcin Cieslak wrote: > On Fri, 12 Sep 2014, John Baldwin wrote: > >> Please note I originally loaded "i915.ko", not "i915kms.ko" > > > > Oh, that is probably your problem. X loaded i915kms automatically and > > i915 and i915kms do not get along. i915 had already allocated the IRQ > > when i915kms tried to alloc the same IRQ causing the issue. > > Would that be possible to fail with EBUSY or something instead of panic? Yes, though in this case you probably will end up with a black screen and an apparent hang due to how KMS works which wouldn't be a lot better. :( -- John Baldwin