From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 14 07:07:56 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 647BC106566C for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 07:07:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mm@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail.vx.sk (mail.vx.sk [IPv6:2a01:4f8:100:1043::3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB9A28FC0C for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 07:07:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from core.vx.sk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.vx.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFAA51431E2; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 08:07:54 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.vx.sk Received: from mail.vx.sk ([127.0.0.1]) by core.vx.sk (mail.vx.sk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id kZGF7aC5z9p4; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 08:07:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from [10.9.8.1] (chello085216231078.chello.sk [85.216.231.78]) by mail.vx.sk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6E4311431D6; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 08:07:52 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4D7DBEC7.807@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 08:07:51 +0100 From: Martin Matuska User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; sk; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090812 Lightning/0.9 Thunderbird/2.0.0.23 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jakub Lach References: <4D7943B1.1030604@FreeBSD.org> <31131269.post@talk.nabble.com> <31131280.post@talk.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <31131280.post@talk.nabble.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Compiler Benchmark: gcc-base vs. gcc-ports vs. clang X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 07:07:56 -0000 After my recent patches to HEAD not anymore. I have also a SSSE3 patch and a general gcc 4.2 update patch pending. Dňa 12.03.2011 09:42, Jakub Lach wrote / napísal(a): > > "Core i7 based procesors run slower with -march=core2 (new option) on the > system > compiler than with -march=nocona" > > Sorry for double mail, isn't CPUTYPE=core2 just alias to nocona with base > compiler? >