Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 08:07:51 +0100 From: Martin Matuska <mm@FreeBSD.org> To: Jakub Lach <jakub_lach@mailplus.pl> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Compiler Benchmark: gcc-base vs. gcc-ports vs. clang Message-ID: <4D7DBEC7.807@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <31131280.post@talk.nabble.com> References: <4D7943B1.1030604@FreeBSD.org> <AANLkTinEXZgvnRxnfWA8PvUuDOFp36oFCwa34nenYWWq@mail.gmail.com> <31131269.post@talk.nabble.com> <31131280.post@talk.nabble.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
After my recent patches to HEAD not anymore. I have also a SSSE3 patch and a general gcc 4.2 update patch pending. Dňa 12.03.2011 09:42, Jakub Lach wrote / napísal(a): > > "Core i7 based procesors run slower with -march=core2 (new option) on the > system > compiler than with -march=nocona" > > Sorry for double mail, isn't CPUTYPE=core2 just alias to nocona with base > compiler? >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4D7DBEC7.807>