From owner-freebsd-doc  Fri May 31 16: 0: 8 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AA2237B400
	for <freebsd-doc@hub.freebsd.org>; Fri, 31 May 2002 16:00:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g4VN05k12623;
	Fri, 31 May 2002 16:00:05 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from gnats)
Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 16:00:05 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <200205312300.g4VN05k12623@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org
Cc: 
From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr>
Subject: Re: docs/38777: In articles 4.x, 3.x should be 4.X and 3.X
Reply-To: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr>
Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-doc.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-doc>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-doc>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

The following reply was made to PR docs/38777; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr>
To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, marc@blackend.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: docs/38777: In articles 4.x, 3.x should be 4.X and 3.X
Date: Sat, 01 Jun 2002 01:55:15 +0300

 > Description
 > 
 >      In articles 4.x, 3.x should be 4.X and 3.X
 >      Read the patch below for more details.
 
 Is this really necessary?
 
 >                   <para>Check out the <filename>miscfs</filename> module as
 >      -              it is in the 4.x branch:</para>
 >      +              it is in the 4.X branch:</para>
 
 Apart from increasing the size of the RCS foo,v files
 that are kept in the repository, why would this need
 to be changed? :P
 
 - Giorgos

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message