From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 9 13:35:30 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B0151065675 for ; Mon, 9 May 2011 13:35:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michael.hoffmann@fh-dortmund.de) Received: from fh-dortmund.de (fhdo.dvz.FH-Dortmund.DE [193.25.16.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A79C98FC0A for ; Mon, 9 May 2011 13:35:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gatekeeper.informatik.fh-dortmund.de (gatekeeper.informatik.FH-Dortmund.DE [193.25.22.84]) by fh-dortmund.de (Switch-3.3.0/Switch-3.3.0) with ESMTP id p49Cxgxi000082 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 9 May 2011 14:59:59 +0200 (MEST) Received: from custos.hw1.fb4.fh (n43.informatik.FH-Dortmund.DE [193.25.22.43]) by gatekeeper.informatik.fh-dortmund.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id p49Bad5x016313 for ; Mon, 9 May 2011 13:37:14 +0200 From: Michael Hoffmann Organization: FH Dortmund To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 13:36:39 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <201105062037.50937.benzene@arcor.de> <4DC50918.3030100@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <4DC50918.3030100@gmx.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201105091336.39646.michael.hoffmann@fh-dortmund.de> Subject: Re: Double installation of liblzma.so.5 breaks libarchive.so.5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 May 2011 13:35:30 -0000 Matthias, > It's apparently not designed to do that. Does "portmaster > --check-depends" complain? It's a shell script from > ports-mgmt/portmaster, just install and run it, it's lightweight (as > opposed to portupgrade). Now there seems to be no trouble anymore. > Was your library path in csh created or suggested by pth-related ports? Hard to say. I've logged things like mergemaster by the script command. Until 7.2 I just found messages like ./etc/csh.cshrc and installed have the same CVS Id, deleting so I can't exactly track when this first appeared in csh.cshrc. (Maybe it's a good idea to trace changes of etc in a version control system from time to time.) > (Perhaps there could be something in the ports framework that warns if > port duplicates base system functionality and suggests to deinstall a > port that is no longer needed -- Would be nice.