From owner-freebsd-current Wed Feb 17 13:39: 3 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from peach.ocn.ne.jp (peach.ocn.ne.jp [210.145.254.87]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C8EB10E5C for ; Wed, 17 Feb 1999 13:38:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dcs@newsguy.com) Received: from newsguy.com by peach.ocn.ne.jp (8.9.1a/OCN) id GAA18331; Thu, 18 Feb 1999 06:38:20 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <36CB3698.E28E4D95@newsguy.com> Date: Thu, 18 Feb 1999 06:37:28 +0900 From: "Daniel C. Sobral" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: pt-BR,ja MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bob Bishop Cc: Mike Smith , mi@aldan.algebra.com, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Buildworld fails on today 3.1-STABLE! References: Your message of "Tue, 16 Feb 1999 17:06:14 EST." <199902162206.RAA26849@misha.cisco.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Bob Bishop wrote: > > At 8:05 pm -0800 16/2/99, Mike Smith wrote: > >[...] > >No, -O2 does not work fine; we've seen reports of it breaking things > >before. > > I've been using -O2 building -current for over a year with no problems. I > haven't dared try it for the kernel though... Lucky you. -O2 *does* break world for many people. Eventually, it might break your world too, and there is a great chance you'll first spam -current before changing -O2 to -O and trying again. Or there would, if we stopped hitting on this nail. :-) -- Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) dcs@newsguy.com dcs@freebsd.org Well, as a computer geek, I have to believe in the binary universe. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message