From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 16 09:42:44 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4080D1065783 for ; Sun, 16 Sep 2012 09:42:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lb0-f182.google.com (mail-lb0-f182.google.com [209.85.217.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6FD68FC14 for ; Sun, 16 Sep 2012 09:42:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lb0-f182.google.com with SMTP id gg13so4408732lbb.13 for ; Sun, 16 Sep 2012 02:42:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=VaSfUjHDD7sTHhqxknxt/WLYgVx7xfi1r/aYuL3/veg=; b=jfyuMgVAgLA4c7r9RaQqGBKi8GkjpvtAPoXqzah6N+8+thZe/jE326dTpDHw2c62A5 e4eip7ZuDBA/9ISiq/QKqVLtYwOIyHBnrHZhpL8BVtA+9dRwmMJ6BDZHa0CiKcgsxAaY U5kRKPEEjORVKFvkA5McFBELsUjMcczBMUeBPKbECUcF9gbufXqMIKN5iR3FtELsyHW3 B62KeMPGtnxBk6yz3RUtMUAC9tzVvweCsmci8Psxf0m6U0gq5FkThhcmjRdzWQ3sF4Bq wb21RpcG/1aUWfb/nK+Gl8ap8KNTCw9dEg0jks6U8/6K0pQ7ygkzTN82rVeArmXu5QQH AJNg== Received: by 10.112.44.228 with SMTP id h4mr2831968lbm.82.1347788563290; Sun, 16 Sep 2012 02:42:43 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: utisoft@gmail.com Received: by 10.112.43.199 with HTTP; Sun, 16 Sep 2012 02:42:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <5054BB1D.4080506@celicom.ru> From: Chris Rees Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2012 10:42:12 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: raJxWjqYmzG-zF_wBmY8FyptlcE Message-ID: To: Odhiambo Washington Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: FreeBSD Questions , Solmin Vladimir Subject: Re: apache 2.2.22_8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2012 09:42:44 -0000 On 16 September 2012 10:37, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > > > On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Chris Rees wrote: >> >> On 16 September 2012 10:20, Odhiambo Washington >> wrote: >> > >> > >> > On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Chris Rees wrote: >> >> >> >> On 16 September 2012 09:32, Odhiambo Washington >> >> wrote: >> >> > Hi Chris, >> >> > >> >> > Thanks for this. >> >> > >> >> > Hopefully, you can modify the Wiki to have this information and even >> >> > examples:) >> >> >> >> There are examples on the Wiki page already, but in a confusing order. >> >> I've put in a link, and a tip on how to find UNIQUENAME. >> >> >> >> > Personally, I use `make config` and have never needed to do much with >> >> > /etc/make.conf as regards the ports. >> >> >> >> True, but some people like to share their make.conf around machines :) >> >> >> >> Chris >> > >> > >> > My machines are all identical too, except for parameters related to >> > $hostname, DNS and passwords. >> > I mostly used /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf before, then `make config` >> > and >> > now I believe I am gonna switch to /etc/make.conf but only where I must >> > finely customize. >> > One thing has crossed my mind now: What happens with make -DWITH_* in >> > this >> > new development of optionsNG?? I have manually built ports that way >> > before. >> > And what about those who want to use portinstall -m WITH_OPTx=1 >> > WITH_OPTy=1, >> > etc? >> >> Still works fine for nearly all ports, but just for apache ports there >> appears to be subtle problems with the logic since it's so >> complicated. That's why Olli chose to disable the WITH_ option style >> for Apache, and I think it was the right decision. >> >> I would suggest you learn the new (just as simple) syntax and see how >> you get on with it :) >> >> Chris > > > I was thinking this optionsNG has already been adopted for all ports. > > Thanks for the examples though. They are good enough for me to learn the > ropes.. > Both syntaxes will work with old and new-style port OPTIONS. Chris