From owner-freebsd-hackers  Mon Sep 16 07:53:43 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id HAA09475
          for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 16 Sep 1996 07:53:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from critter.tfs.com ([140.145.230.252])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id HAA09458;
          Mon, 16 Sep 1996 07:53:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from critter.tfs.com (localhost.tfs.com [127.0.0.1]) by critter.tfs.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id QAA16046; Mon, 16 Sep 1996 16:53:03 +0200 (MET DST)
To: dennis@etinc.com (Dennis)
cc: Kurt Schafer <kurt@cyberbeach.net>, hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Could use a favor 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 16 Sep 1996 10:44:34 EDT."
             <199609161444.KAA16111@etinc.com> 
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 1996 16:53:03 +0200
Message-ID: <16044.842885583@critter.tfs.com>
From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.tfs.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

In message <199609161444.KAA16111@etinc.com>, Dennis writes:
>>I've been having problems getting some 2.1.5-RELEASE systems outputting data
>>to the net. I've since brought up a machine on 2.1-RELEASE and put a
>>plain-jane default apache process on the box.
>>
>>If people could try resolving http://wave.cyberbeach.net and drop me a
>>message outlining their success/failure I would be appreciative.
>
>Perhaps unrelated....but I've noticed if I configure IP firewalling into the
>kernel
>the default seems to be that the system cant do anything. Can anyone outline
>why that is....

See the mail-archives for a long discussion on this.

--
Poul-Henning Kamp           | phk@FreeBSD.ORG       FreeBSD Core-team.
http://www.freebsd.org/~phk | phk@login.dknet.dk    Private mailbox.
whois: [PHK]                | phk@ref.tfs.com       TRW Financial Systems, Inc.
Future will arrive by its own means, progress not so.