Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 02:30:28 -0600 From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> To: Kirill Ponomarew <krion@FreeBSD.org> Cc: perl@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/mail/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin Makefile distinfo Message-ID: <3FE2B724.9060902@lonesome.com> In-Reply-To: <20031219081604.GH90871@voodoo.oberon.net> References: <200312190805.hBJ85pPL021711@repoman.freebsd.org> <63476156.1071825145@sauron.in.mat.cc> <20031219081604.GH90871@voodoo.oberon.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > >Maybe it's better to move all p5-* ports which are maintained >by ports@FreeBSD.org to perl@FreeBSD.org ? > > Please don't do this. In addition to the repo churn, there are many places in the FreeBSD documentation that state that "ports@" is the canonical stand-in value for "unmaintained". This would violate POLA IMHO. I believe that my ports monitoring code and Bill Fenner's distfile survey parsers would also have to be reworked. I don't know about the FreshPorts code but I wouldn't be surprised. mcl
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3FE2B724.9060902>