Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 08:39:29 -0800 From: Jose Quinteiro <freebsd@quinteiro.org> To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Latest and quarterly best practices Message-ID: <a1dd3f3f-c15e-92bd-0a7c-13e921b7cb19@quinteiro.org> In-Reply-To: <ZaGqhDx9gpuUt3mJ@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <NnH9ree--3-9@tuta.io> <ttns-rgv3-wny@FreeBSD.org> <84dca503-78ff-8fed-73d6-153f38478c71@quinteiro.org> <ZaGqhDx9gpuUt3mJ@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 1/12/24 13:09, Rene Ladan wrote: > On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 09:51:06AM -0800, Jose Quinteiro wrote: >> On 1/4/24 12:19, Jan Beich wrote: >>> >> Maybe there are some ports that should not exist in the quarterly >> branch? Looks like some of these are under such heavy development that >> they really don't have a stable version. >> > The quarterly branches are just that, branches of main at the beginning > of a quarter, so such ports would have to be manually removed for each > branch. > This is trivially scriptable. I would not be surprised if the process of cutting a new quarterly branch is already scripted. Thanks, Jose
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?a1dd3f3f-c15e-92bd-0a7c-13e921b7cb19>