Date: Sun, 29 Aug 1999 20:07:41 -0500 (CDT) From: Steve Price <sprice@hiwaay.net> To: Chris Piazza <cpiazza@home.net> Cc: Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami <asami@FreeBSD.ORG>, FreeBSD Ports <ports@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: USE_QT2 in bsd.port.mk Message-ID: <Pine.OSF.4.10.9908291958480.14350-100000@fly.HiWAAY.net> In-Reply-To: <19990829175424.C34749@norn.ca.eu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 29 Aug 1999, Chris Piazza wrote: #>> Is it incompatible with QT-1.4*? #> #> Not at all. # # Err, misread that. It is not at all compatible with qt-1.4x Speaking of incompatible and repository copies... Does anyone but me think it would be a good idea to put this port in a directory like qt200 instead of qt2, since we've had a history of having at least 3 of these things around for a long time. If we moved the port to a new directory, Satoshi could do a repo-copy first, Chris could commit the good bits over that, and then we could kill off qt2. If having qt200 is too much, how about having a qt2xx/qt2x/qt20x/qt20 instead. If the past is any indication we'll soon have 3 different versions of QT2 laying around along with 3 versions of QT1 to support all the ports in the tree. :/ -steve To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.OSF.4.10.9908291958480.14350-100000>