From owner-cvs-all Mon Jan 11 09:56:09 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA04889 for cvs-all-outgoing; Mon, 11 Jan 1999 09:56:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (castles234.castles.com [208.214.165.234]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA04879 for ; Mon, 11 Jan 1999 09:56:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@dingo.cdrom.com) Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dingo.cdrom.com (8.9.1/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA92509; Mon, 11 Jan 1999 09:49:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@dingo.cdrom.com) Message-Id: <199901111749.JAA92509@dingo.cdrom.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: Jeremy Lea cc: Nik Clayton , Dag-Erling Smorgrav , committers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: sysctl descriptions In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 11 Jan 1999 15:05:17 +0200." <19990111150517.B3187@shale.csir.co.za> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 09:49:14 -0800 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > > Instead of having /boot, why not have /_KERNEL_? One directory per kernel > config file, named after the config file, and will all of the stuff built > for that kernel. eg: Because 99.9% of the userbase have and want exactly one kernel, and couldn't give a rat's ass about support for more than one. We need to support the concept so that developers don't go ballistic, but it's not something that calls for that sort of mess. -- \\ Sometimes you're ahead, \\ Mike Smith \\ sometimes you're behind. \\ mike@smith.net.au \\ The race is long, and in the \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ end it's only with yourself. \\ msmith@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message