From owner-freebsd-audit Thu Jun 14 7:40:38 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-audit@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 496FE37B405; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 07:40:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from des@ofug.org) Received: (from des@localhost) by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) id QAA28144; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 16:40:32 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from des@ofug.org) X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: Robert Watson Cc: David Malone , freebsd-audit@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Allowing ident in a jail. References: From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 14 Jun 2001 16:40:32 +0200 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Lines: 9 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-audit@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Robert Watson writes: > Well, it does leak information, but only if jails leak sockets. [...] Yes. Is it really necessary to discuss this any further? It seems quite clear to me that we are in violent agreement :) DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-audit" in the body of the message