Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 23:34:02 -0800 From: "Michael C. Shultz" <ringworm01@gmail.com> To: Jiawei Ye <leafy7382@gmail.com> Cc: Craig Boston <craig@yekse.gank.org>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why does security/amavisd-new depend on db3? Message-ID: <200511142334.03273.ringworm01@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <c21e92e20511142338o3c7c43e0k8fef33a042803bdd@mail.gmail.com> References: <c21e92e20511130557g4ad76176l85beb6ceee078886@mail.gmail.com> <200511142311.51781.ringworm01@gmail.com> <c21e92e20511142338o3c7c43e0k8fef33a042803bdd@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Monday 14 November 2005 23:38, Jiawei Ye wrote: > On 11/15/05, Michael C. Shultz <ringworm01@gmail.com> wrote: > > portmanager security/amavisd-new > > > > It should keep things focused to just what is relevent to > > security/amavisd-new I don't see any xorg dependencies in their, do you? > > > > -Mike > > Ok, I *manually* removed amavisd-new *and* p5-BerkeleyDB and rebuilt > them manually. Now portmanager handle them correctly while portupgrade > still chokes. +1 for portmanager, maybe I'll just stick to it. > > Jiawei I'm still clueless at what the problem was because you never did provide any useful information, but I am glad you managed to fix what ever was wrong. -Mike
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200511142334.03273.ringworm01>