From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Apr 26 17:47:19 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id RAA14730 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 26 Apr 1996 17:47:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from vent.pipex.net (root@vent.pipex.net [158.43.128.5]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id RAA14718 for ; Fri, 26 Apr 1996 17:47:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dial.pipex.com by vent.pipex.net (8.6.12/PIPEX simple 1.20) id BAA05933; Sat, 27 Apr 1996 01:46:50 +0100 Received: (from jraynard@localhost) by dial.pipex.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) id AAA01849; Sat, 27 Apr 1996 00:01:16 GMT Date: Sat, 27 Apr 1996 00:01:16 GMT From: James Raynard Message-Id: <199604270001.AAA01849@dial.pipex.com> To: julian@ref.tfs.com CC: bde@zeta.org.au, hackers@freebsd.org In-reply-to: <199604251802.LAA25761@ref.tfs.com> (julian@ref.tfs.com) Subject: Re: Flaws in system() implementation? Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > Joerg said that the draft POSIX spec is on the (old) WC Internet Info > > cdrom. I haven't got it. > > I have actually only got the x/open XPG4 spec which says that it is POSIX2 > compliant Is this readily available anywhere? (I've got the CDROM on order - lots of other useful stuff like RFCs on there, apparently). > > It's less ambiguous than julianese :-). It completely specifies the > gee thanks :) Don't worry, I find your posts quite intelligible, which is more than you can say for most standards 8-) Cheers James -- James Raynard, Edinburgh, Scotland mail: jraynard@dial.pipex.com