From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 12 00:52:56 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54DC916A4CE for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 00:52:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from VARK.MIT.EDU (VARK.MIT.EDU [18.95.3.179]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC29643D62 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 00:52:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from VARK.MIT.EDU (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by VARK.MIT.EDU (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j1C0qWTc044437; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 19:52:32 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: (from das@localhost) by VARK.MIT.EDU (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j1C0qSxK044436; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 19:52:28 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG) Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 19:52:28 -0500 From: David Schultz To: Jonathan Weiss Message-ID: <20050212005228.GA43996@VARK.MIT.EDU> Mail-Followup-To: Jonathan Weiss , "Smith III, Edward Mr. CAA/ISC" , Joerg Schilling , freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freesd.org References: <0A907D6523E90246822D32FA2344E244015E4B@CAA-UNCLMAIL.caa.army.mil> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: cc: "Smith III, Edward Mr. CAA/ISC" cc: freebsd-current@freesd.org cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG cc: Joerg Schilling Subject: Re: Star & FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 00:52:56 -0000 On Fri, Feb 11, 2005, Jonathan Weiss wrote: > > Is the CDDL license compatible with the BSD and MIT licenses? > > According to the OpenBSD-folks: NO Actually, I think the answer is YES. You're apparently answering a different question. See below. It is my understanding that virtually any open-source license is *compatible* with the MIT and 2-clause BSD licenses, since all the MIT/2-clause BSD licenses require is that you acknowledge and preserve the license, copyright, and disclaimer. However, I believe it is generally not possible to use CDDL code for integral parts of FreeBSD because, like the LGPL, the CDDL requires that modifications be made available under the CDDL. It is probably fine for kernel modules and extensions, but that's something core@ needs to decide. Disclaimer: I am not a lawyer and make no guarantee about the accuracy of the contents of this message. The opinions herein do not reflect those of the FreeBSD Project. Use this information at your own peril. Beware of dog. Slippery when wet.