From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 13 21:37:24 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A922A1065670; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 21:37:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from utility-0.aerioconnect.net (utility-0.aerioconnect.net [216.240.32.11]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AAF98FC13; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 21:37:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from idiom.com (mx0.idiom.com [216.240.32.160]) by utility-0.aerioconnect.net (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o0DKSXBV011267; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 12:28:33 -0800 X-Client-Authorized: MaGic Cook1e X-Client-Authorized: MaGic Cook1e X-Client-Authorized: MaGic Cook1e X-Client-Authorized: MaGic Cook1e X-Client-Authorized: MaGic Cook1e X-Client-Authorized: MaGic Cook1e X-Client-Authorized: MaGic Cook1e Received: from julian-mac.elischer.org (h-67-100-89-137.snfccasy.static.covad.net [67.100.89.137]) by idiom.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64EF72D6018; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 12:28:32 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4B4E2CEF.5030709@elischer.org> Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 12:28:31 -0800 From: Julian Elischer User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Macintosh/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: John Baldwin References: <20100112.174326.337739863389869251.imp@bsdimp.com> <4B4E1586.7090102@FreeBSD.org> <201001131515.08602.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <201001131515.08602.jhb@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Doug Barton , svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: INCLUDE_CONFIG_FILE in GENERIC X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 21:37:24 -0000 John Baldwin wrote: > On Wednesday 13 January 2010 1:48:38 pm Doug Barton wrote: >> To address the other responses, Tom, sorry, your suggested text doesn't >> address my concern. John, I don't think that users would somehow >> magically know to look in NOTES for more information about an option >> that is already in GENERIC. > > You really think users do not already know to look in manpages or NOTES to > find out more details about kernel options? how about a one line comment in GENERIC suggesting that people look at NOTES for more info.