From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 27 23:11:42 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6CF30921; Thu, 27 Mar 2014 23:11:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from shepard.synsport.net (mail.synsport.com [208.69.230.148]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4123F3EA; Thu, 27 Mar 2014 23:11:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.20] (unknown [130.255.19.191]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shepard.synsport.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7E25438BD; Thu, 27 Mar 2014 18:11:19 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <5334B006.1070805@marino.st> Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 00:11:02 +0100 From: John Marino User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dimitry Andric , Mark R V Murray Subject: Re: Port devel/gdb broken on 11-CURRENT amd64. References: <73962E64-42F0-4042-8647-2DE7C78005AB@FreeBSD.org> <4AC81949-35A8-4760-BEFC-315DB278E41E@FreeBSD.org> <1040C8F5-CA6A-4CC3-840A-64EB213C95EE@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <1040C8F5-CA6A-4CC3-840A-64EB213C95EE@FreeBSD.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: ports@freebsd.org, pizzamig X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list Reply-To: marino@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 23:11:42 -0000 On 3/27/2014 23:09, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 24 Mar 2014, at 22:32, Mark R V Murray wrote: >> >> On 24 Mar 2014, at 15:34, pizzamig wrote: >>> I've already got a report about that, but I'm on holiday, without a CURRENT system, I cannot work on it right now... >>> I guess CURRENT has a new clang version… >> >> Yup! It’s Clang v3.4. I’ve done a local dirty fix of ‘CFLAGS+=-Wno-error’ in the Port Makefile. I suspect it will need rather more than this to cover all the CLANG and GCC versions that are around. > > IMHO it is fairly ridiculous the port is compiled with -Werror. If we > were gdb developers, I could understand, but for contributed software it > does not make much sense. Maybe the maintainer can apply the following > patch, which I have literally had for years in my ports tree now. > agreed. FWIW, I applied a very similar patch to devel/gdb66 on 18 Nov 2013 because it was broken on head too. All gdb ports should disable this absurd build default. John